On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jon Masters <j...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 11:18 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500 > > Tom Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> escribió: > > > On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > I just didn't know if there was any "filtering" going on for the > > > > mass rebuild or if all packages, regardless of dependence on gcc > > > > were going to be rebuilt. > > > > > > My understanding is that we traditionally rebuild everything at the > > > time of a mass rebuild, because it is a good excuse to do it. > > > Im planning to just rebuild everything. ideally drop all the disttags > > prior to fc17 since people get antsy about that at times. > > > > those packages that still have anything before .fc15 really need > > rebuilt. since we had reasons then to rebuild everything > > +1 > > This is a great time to rebuild everything. Not only does it assist with > the gcc 4.7 switchover but it also proves that everything builds. And > that turns out to be very useful when bootstrapping new architectures. I > was planning (and still am) to make a formal proposal that Fedora > require a mass rebuild every 2 releases if none is done for incidental > reasons, just to help with ensuring the whole thing does still build. > > Jon. > > > Don't we do this anyway whenever we get a new major GCC release?
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel