On 01/05/2012 10:06 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 21:47 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I guess you are referring an "ordered rebuild", not a "simple sequential
rebuild".
The latter would be mostly useless.
For bootstrapping, ideally there would be ordered rebuilds, but even any
mass rebuild assists more than having none at all :)
Well, all these sequential "mass rebuilds" are useful for, is to check
whether the current toolchain can build a previously buildable package :)
They do not mean the resulting packages are more or less broken than
those having been built by predecessors of the toolchains.
[Remember, in recent years, we have several times been hit by cases when
rebuilts inherited bugs from e.g. rpm, glibc, or GCC.]
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
