On 01/27/2012 12:21 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > Yes, we are of course trying to push the patches upstream, but it is a bit > problematic, since the upstream says, that this is an FHS-specific issue and > they only want to do general solutions - see [1] for the discussion. > > Regards, > Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda. > > [1] https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/issues/210
That's not quite what upstream says and I think we can move this forward if you rope in the ruby maintainers from other major distributions and get broader support. Meanwhile, using this patch downstream seems unwarranted since there is no urgent need to fix this. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
