Perhaps he was just not aware of these objections. Although I could not speak for him but it's at least a possible explanation for the proposal.
Johannes On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 12:50 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > On 04/27/2012 08:58 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> > wrote: > > >> The whole thing is clearly a mess that needs some high level > > >> streamlining, from the entire process of download from web page (or > > >> receive CD from friend) to the on-disk install first boot. > > > > > > While I certainly wouldn't disagree with this statement, let's not let > > > perfect get in the way of better here. > > > > > > What can we do in the *near* term to make it easier for people to find > > > the "Install to Hard Drive" option from the LiveCD? > > > > How about installing the Dock extension on the liveuser account, and > > configuring it to *not* auto-hide? That way we get a solution that > > a) many users use anyway > > b) is aesthetically pleasing > > I don't see the point of making proposals like this which it's quite > clear have absolutely no chance of happening. Desktop team has already > stated clearly that they won't set up extensions as default > configuration. Continuing to 'suggest' that they do is only likely to > rile them up and start another of those long boring argumentative > threads that have no purpose... > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
