Re: RFC: Feature process improvements

[Miloslav Trmač]

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Miller
<mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing features or
> critical path components". What's the threshold for defaults? (LVM, for a
> specific example.) What's the threshold for a change to a critical path
> component?
I don't think we need a strict definition; in the proposal anyone can
ask FESCo to consider a feature 'complex', so in practice, the
threshold would be "somebody asked FESCo to" (and of course, that
"somebody" can be the feature owner).
    Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel