On 12/01/2012 02:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 12:21 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:42:15AM -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing
features or critical path components". What's the threshold for
defaults? (LVM, for a specific example.) What's the threshold for a
change to a critical path component?
We were discussing even critpaths, but currently is in critical path
almost everything.
If true, I think that asking for clarity on the thresholds is even more
important. If almost everything really is on the critical path, we need to
either a) find a way to reduce that or b) recognize it and treat features
more carefully.
It's not really true, no, though it can seem that way.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/lists/critpath?tg_format=plain&collctn_list=f18
is the current F18 critpath list. It's 583 packages; quite big, but a long way
from 'almost everything'.
That's short. I thought KDE and GNOME will be bigger, but there are only
the essential packages. I guess critpaths as system-wide features might
be doable.
--
Marcela Mašláňová
BaseOS team Brno
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
