On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 00:10 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: > > > On Monday, January 28, 2013, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 14:53 +0000, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > The Gnome 3 interface is substantially different that the > traditional desktop > > interfaces on both Linux and Windows. > > At least for Windows 8, neither Cinnamon is close to its > desktop > interface. > > > While it is good that there is research > > into new user interface concepts, many users prefer to have > a traditional > > interface that they are accustomed to. Unfortunately it is > difficult or > > impossible to assess what fraction of the user base prefers > Gnome Shell vs. a > > more traditional interface. > > Exactly. There is no way to know that. So I see no real reason > to change > our default desktop. > Even if we consider Gnome 3 as a "research" (which I don't), > Fedora is > known to adopt innovative technologies. > > > -- > Nikos Roussos > comzeradd @ freenode.net > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > Innovative. > > > "Innovative" or "deevolutionary", "boring", or just plain "annoying"? > They can all be used in different ways. What you might consider > "innovative" a lot of people consider annoying.
True. Or others might consider it productive. Same goes for all Desktop environments. That's why I said that I see no real argument here for changing our default desktop. -- Nikos Roussos comzeradd @ freenode.net
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
