On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> wrote: > > Le Mar 12 mars 2013 21:53, Máirín Duffy a écrit : >> I tried breaking this thread down into its components and summarizing >> the discussion and points brought up thus far. I hope it helps: >> >> http://blog.linuxgrrl.com/2013/03/12/improving-the-fedora-boot-experience/ > > Máirín, > > The proposal discussed here is not to "keep the hood on the car". > The proposal is to remove any indication there is a hood, and show the > user a seamless surface with no hint it can be opened (or how). > > No one there objects to pretty hoods. They object to fixing the hood > appearance by removing any indication of a hood. > > Good car design is not removing the emergency tail lights button because > it "ruins" the panel appearance. Good car design is to keep the emergency > tail lights button, and make it pretty. Even if regulations demand it is > bright red when the designer wanted a smooth black panel.
You are making too much fuzz about "emergency" and "maintenance"... we tried this once and the world didn't fall over. The only reason why we don't have it now is the move to grub2. If you know 1) what a kernel is 2) that booting a different kernel might fix your boot issue then you should be able to open the boot menu. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel