On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 15:04 -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote: > If it is absolute no, I would proceed with the Anaconda patch if > there is a good explanation/alternative to the 3 issues I have > listed above.
Talk to the anaconda devs first. I'm no expert on anaconda internals, but I play one on TV, and I'm pretty sure they wouldn't take a patch that tries to uninstall stuff from the system it just installed. There are already mechanisms in anaconda for conditionally adding packages to the 'to be installed' set, based on the system architecture, and probably some other things. You probably want to either make use of or at least mirror the design of these existing mechanisms, rather than just inventing a new one out of thin air. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
