On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal <dan.mas...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Luyten <p...@luyten.fr> wrote: >> Not sure if it makes any sense but maybe could we have something like >> "freeze tag changes until desc is better". >> >> I propose this because testers will not _really_ want to -1 karma, and >> as a maintainer it might be a bit hard, but with a good reminder like >> "not pushed to stable until desc is better" I would have made less >> mistakes >> >> yes not being reminded is not an excuse and such proposal would not save >> time, still I believe it could help more than hurt > > > There is already a perfect example of this. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11846/selinux-policy-3.12.1-57.fc19
This is also a perfect example of useless "does not fix bug x" karma. If it is not *worse* then the previous package there is no reason to give it negative karma. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
