On Thursday, June 20, 2013 02:38:37 PM Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 13:15 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > I think most "traditional" system admins see a running NM daemon as an > > additional point of failure in a static network. If my server's network > > setup is static, I don't want a daemon running attempting to "manage" > > it. If it has a bug, gets misconfigured, etc., it might do something to > > screw up an otherwise working setup. > > Yes, it's just not easy to do without creating race conditions. Various > other components use NetworkManager as an API, and if just called exit() > arbitrarily it'd introduce the problems described here: > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11454 > > This point has been raised repeatedly, the developers are aware that > it'd be nicer for NM to not show up in "ps" in these situations, but the > reason it's not done is it's nontrivial and there are a lot of other > things in the priority queue.
Maybe split off all functionality from the dbus daemon into separate binaries (off the top of my head, about a dozen, each in a separate package) and the dbus daemon uses system() to invoke the appropriate one when requested. Servers would just dispense with the daemon and invoke binaries directly in a startup script. Davide Bolcioni
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
