On 9 July 2013 10:57, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Miloslav Trmač <m...@volny.cz> wrote: > > nnnOn Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jaroslav Reznik <jrez...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> = Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture = > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary > > > > How many F19 packages currently fail to build (or are excluded but > > shouldn't be) on ARM? How do we stand against the other items of > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements > > At F-19 gold we were missing around 233 source packages out of around > 13,500 total. These are broken down into a couple of groups: > - Non ARM packages (x86/PPC/s390) > - Languages not currerntly supported on ARM - eg D, a fpc and a few others > - Packages that have issues with their CFLAGS (and actually should be > fine if they used distro flags like they should) > - Random other problems. > > I'm planning on going through these again and document the remaining > packages. > > How do we treat "Desktop" items where the package compiles fine but does not run well without external drivers (the GNOME on ARM conversation earlier ) Or am I misreading that conversation. -- Stephen J Smoogen.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
