On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:09 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 25 July 2013 16:59, Billy Crook <billycr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bastien Nocera <bnoc...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Given the amount of time that he spent on the mailing-list fighting for > >> those features, then it looks like a waste of time, that work has been > >> done. > > > > Unfeatures technically. He wanted to remove features from the Default > > spin. Subtracting functionality is not a feature. He wanted an > > unfeature. > > > > No he wanted out of the default install. We have a badly defined > naming scheme which is causing confusion: > > default install -> what you get when you put the DVD in and do a click > through install. > default spin -> The GNOME desktop livecd. > > Spins are managed by their respective "teams": > default has been GNOME and managed by GNOME sig > kde is managed by KDE sig > xfce is managed by XFCE sig > etc etc > > So I would say that the GNOME team is within its rights in managing > its spin. Whether it is named default etc is someone else's problem.
The tension between Desktop being a 'spin' and also being our 'default deliverable' has never really been resolved comprehensively at a policy level, as I see it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
