On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think you're misinterpreting the words of Christian. Red Hat (also > my employer, but speaking for myself here) can't and shouldn't be pay > to fix and QA spins like LXDE or MATE. If keeping a MATE spin makes it > harder or slower for the people developing GNOME (which Red Hat should > sponsor) then I don't see the problem in his statement. Red Hat spends > a ton of money on Fedora, and I think a lot of the community seem to > forget that. The QA already doesn't have blockers for spins. As adam has mentioned spins don't affect QA's work or progress at all. I understand red hat spends a lot of money on fedora, but wielding the spins away is definitely a bad rapport for the community and it in turn a negative thing to participate for the project too.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct