On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:30:58AM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 4, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: > > > >> I think that half the difficulty here is that UEFI is annoying and the > >> other half is that both GRUB2 and efibootmgr are miserable. > > > > For single OS installs, you shouldn't have to interact with any of those > > things. shim.efi, or shim via fallback.efi (?) will even do a fallback boot > > of Fedora if NVRAM has somehow been vanquished. > > How does firmware find shim.efi? Is it installed as bootx64.efi? > IIRC that approach used to be frowned upon.
It installs a fallback loader as bootx64.efi which then creates new boot entries for any installed operating systems it can find. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
