Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> writes: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky > <sochotni...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Since javadoc subpackages put files in /usr/share/javadoc they must >> require package that provides this directory. > > In my opinion all javadocs should be crosslinked with local JDK's > javadocs (+ others as appropriate) and have a dependency on > java-javadoc. The JDK -javadoc packages could either own the > /usr/share/javadoc or have a dependency on a package providing it. Two > problems solved...
Actually we are strongly considering getting rid of javadocs completely[1] mostly due to Java 8 problems. We might be able to leave them be perhaps, but it's just a lot of work with uncertain benefits/users and it's slowing down builds considerably. Email on java-devel explains this in more detail. [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2014-February/005133.html -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni...@redhat.com> Software Engineer - Developer Experience PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
pgpiO_3R_Kmdb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
