On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 11:31 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > And I think those subpackages probably _should_ conflict, don't you? > > > > Depends. Sgallagh had a desire to mark that a particular system > implemented multiple products (ie server that also had workstation > installed). I'm not sure that's a good idea but if we did go that route > then we'd have to be able to support that with our identifiers. > Subpackages that conflict wouldn't be flexible enough to handle that.
Just for the more-public-record, I remain pretty sure this is a bad idea and don't think we should allow it. You should always be considered to be running exactly 0 or 1 Products. I think we should consider how to allow things like 'run a desktop on the Server product', but that shouldn't be conceived as 'run Workstation on Server'. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
