Il 21/mar/2014 12:59 "Matthew Miller" <mat...@fedoraproject.org> ha scritto: > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:28:26AM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > > I agree with Jaroslav. I was looking forward to have a fourth > > product to those three. KDE can help define what is needed for new > > product, what must be done by all teams, how much work it will be > > ... I guess we should speak more about addition of new product and > > don't kill the idea at the start. > > Like I said, I'm skeptical, but listening. :) > > -- > Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mat...@fedoraproject.org>
I think the same, if all spins become products we can also keep the actual way. Fedora.next is a very good idea and I'm sure it will have success, but it needs to follow his strategy with three different products, not having 2 different ones and *n* workstation-similar-products, IMHO. I don't think spins are not useful, but they could be under the wing of Workstation as a sub-product perhaps. This is how I understand and think about fedora.next, so proliferation of products is not really what it should be in my eyes. Greetings Robert Mayr (robyduck)
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
