On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:44:06PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:39:52PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Ok. Once the build's done let's remove the ExcludeArch so it continues > > to show up as a failure in mass builds. It can be restored if we > > actually need to make any code changes. > > Where is the Fedora policy that we should break builds so that we can > collectively remember there is a bug in a particular architecture? > That's what Bugzilla is for.
Having it show up on the FTBFS list sparked a discussion that noted upstream movement on this. If it hadn't been there we wouldn't have noticed, and even once LLVM is fixed this would probably have remained ExcludeArch: arm. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
