On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:11:53PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:05:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > In this case however I don't think much productive came from this
> > discussion we had about hfsplus-tools. Obviously no one wants
> > hfsplus-tools and/or clang enough on Fedora/ARM that they are prepared
> > to fix it. So I think we should just drop it on ARM, and let anyone
> > who wants it, fix it later (or reenable %{arm} if clang gets fixed).
>
> If the Fedora/ARM community don't care about feature parity with x86,
> then we should just drop them back to secondary status.
That was overly critical of me and did nothing to actually further the
discussion. I apologise.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
