On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:21 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 07:06:51AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:50:55PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > em* and p?p? come from biosdevname, which should not be used and is > deprecated. > > > > > > I'm merely observing what happened when I updated a bunch of servers > > > from F22 to F23. I didn't intentionally install nor uninstall > biosdevname > > > at any point. > And this is the crux of the problem: for some reason biosdevname > stopped working for you. This was not intentional and should not > happen. Is biosdevname it still installed? Can you file a bug > against systemd and attach output of 'sudo udevadm test > /sys/class/net/eno1' > (or whatever the name the device has in the end)? > > > But you should have. Biosdevname what deprecated 3 years ago (with > Fedora 19 > > or 20*), you should have migrated your rules to udev's naming scheme and > > remove biosdevname. > That's true, but not really relevant. We neither removed biosdevname nor > announced that is not supported anymore, and if it suddenly stopped working > we need to figure out why. > > Well, I still have biosdevname-0.6.2-1.fc23.x86_64 installed on the desktop machine I mentioned was upgraded in the original post, where the NIC was changed from em1 to eno1 on the upgrade. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280037
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
