> That's fine. I don't have a problem adding "GNOME on Xorg" option to
> the session
> menu in the interim. I'll do it tomorrow.
This is what the feature page said would happen in the first place. So
I'm also confused why you didn't just do that.
>
> I will say you're coming off (to me anyway) as somewhat combative. We're on
> the same team here. Let's keep it constructive and friendly?
Okay, I'll try and be a little less pissed off at disabling features users
use, that we've spent years implementing in X/GNOME.
The fact you are requesting wayland by default while we still have the
following list:
Close all remaining feature parity gaps between the Wayland and the X11 session:
input methods
on-screen keyboard
hi-dpi support
clipboard proxy for xwayland
attached modal dialogs
tablet support
startup notification
touch proxy for xwayland
accessibility features
output rotation
These are just the missing features (never mind dialog boxes in wierd places
bugs)
and it doesn't even contain the USB output hotplugging, or secondary GPU output
use cases.
So maybe I'm getting old, but I thought we were over shoving half-baked onto
users now,
Maybe implement all those features, get them into the non-default wayland
session,
then go lobby for enabling the wayland session by default, otherwise I feel you
are
putting the cart before the horse.
Dave.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
