On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 02/26/2016 08:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a): > >> No languages are available by default, we did this because otherwise > >> you keep carrying forward locales that you can't remove. > > > > For this reasons we have weak dependencies. I guess that: > > Recommends: glibc-all-langpacks > > can do the work (install or by default, can be safely removed). Or > > Suggests: glibc-all-langpacks > > so it is not installed by default, but users can get the information that > > it can enhance the usability of glibc. > > > > > Yeah, I think the best approach would be to have all the langpacks offer a > virtual Provides: glibc-langpack and have the main package Requires: > glibc-langpack and Suggests: glibc-all-langpacks. The net result would be that > unless a specific langpack was chosen, you'd end up with all of them to > satisfy > the requirement. (This would also unbreak the upgrades without needing a patch > to dnf system-upgrade)
That would be a much better solution. dnf-system-upgrade so far didn't have any special handling for specific packages (except for a check that the kernel is in the upgrade transaction) and there no mechanism like this is implemented. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
