On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 16:01 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Is this (1) new version of Rawhide report which will stay or (2) is this
> just some temporary version or (3) is it something completely new and
> the old Rawhide report is not sent just due to some issues?
> 
> If (1) is the case, then it is missing broken dependencies and the has
> readability regresses.

It is (1). releng already knows that broken dependencies are missing,
and they're working to get it back. For readability issues you can file
tickets (or pull requests!) at https://pagure.io/compose-utils .

Note that I'm currently working to add the image checks from the
"compose check report"s to this email, then the "compose check report"
emails would just be openQA status emails.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to