On Monday, February 29, 2016 04:29:08 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 29.2.2016 v 16:10 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > > On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 16:01 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Is this (1) new version of Rawhide report which will stay or (2) is this > >> just some temporary version or (3) is it something completely new and > >> the old Rawhide report is not sent just due to some issues? > >> > >> If (1) is the case, then it is missing broken dependencies and the has > >> readability regresses. > > > > It is (1). releng already knows that broken dependencies are missing, > > and they're working to get it back. > > Thx for explanation. > > > For readability issues you can file > > > > tickets (or pull requests!) at https://pagure.io/compose-utils . > > > > Note that I'm currently working to add the image checks from the > > "compose check report"s to this email, then the "compose check report" > > emails would just be openQA status emails. > > My complain is for example about the glibc in this specific report. Look > at the amount of listed RPMS and they are duplicated once more as Added > RPMS. Yes, this might be interesting information, but 3 pages of glibc > subpackages does not help. > > Actually, I don't understand, why the email is word wrapped. It causes > plenty of formation issues. My email client is capable enough to wrap > the lines when needed.
Because kmail wrapped them Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
