On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Matthew Brush <mbr...@codebrainz.ca> wrote:
> > > On 2015-11-08 12:25 PM, Matthew Brush wrote: > >> >> >> On 2015-11-08 3:19 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: >> >>> On 9 November 2015 at 05:34, Devyn Collier Johnson >>> <devyncjohn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> [...] >>>> - Adding "*.i;" to "C=" >>>> *.i - C source code which should not be preprocessed >>>> http://labor-liber.org/en/gnu-linux/development/extensions >>>> >>> >>> g++ treats this as C++, all languages are *not* C :) >>> >>> This is the same problem as .h, it could be either. >>> >>> >> I've been meaning to bring this up. We should move *.h to C++ now that >> C++ can use C tags. Having it under C means C++ headers don't work, but >> having it under C++ works for both C and C++ headers. >> >> > Oops, I forgot the tags from the C++ header wouldn't be visible in C files > (the opposite is not true). I still think *.h should be for C++, but it's > probably a hard sell for Geany crowd, it being written in plain C and all :) I made it the opposite way too here (to be fully reviewed/merged): https://github.com/techee/geany/commit/5c18b3d1328b8d3dff923a2a02bc3cc6b41a333c see the langs_compatible() function. I would personally also like what you suggest but another problem is that e.g. a C variable named "template"(plus all the extra keywords C++ has) could screw up the parsing. Cheers, Jiri
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
