On 7/14/07, Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2007, at 5:54 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> > Unless we're actually going to do a full cryptographic authentication
> > of the entire FS image at every boot, the kernel checking is just
> > security theater.
> I missed this message when originally following the thread. This is
> incorrect. Verifying the integrity of the kernel and the initramfs is
> necessary and sufficient for guaranteeing that the anti-theft daemon
> gets started in a container that cannot be killed. Making theft non-
> trivial is the entire point behind the crypto dance; if that is met,
> we don't care whether the rest of the FS is modified.

This seems to imply a much beefier initramfs than is currently the
case, and one that is invoked on every boot.
  --scott
-- 
                         ( http://cscott.net/ )
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to