On Dec 26, 2007 12:27 PM, ffm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to the download page for ship.2, 653 is the latest signed stable, > but according to OS images the latest image is 650. Since many issues that > were in 650 have been fixed in 653, and 653 seems to run w/o issues, why the > two different sources? > > Since 653 is signed and (iirc) fixed WPA issues, should we not tell users to > update to 653 to fix their issues?
653 was a stop-gap release and has been tested only as a clean install. Upgrading from 650 to 653 has not been tested, and so using olpc-update to get from 650 to 653 is not (yet?) recommended. That is the reason for the discrepancy: we can't yet recommend 653 as an update. Users who need WPA should do a clean install of 653, which will remove any content they had created in the Journal. At the moment, Update.1 will be the first recommended/tested *update* (as opposed to clean install), although it is possible we will release something-like-653 which we could feel comfortable recommending as an update. --scott -- ( http://cscott.net/ ) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel