Hrm. Well... I updated my G!G! to 653 and it *seems* to have worked... caveat being that i have not done detailed testing... just "use testing"...
JK On Dec 26, 2007 1:46 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 26, 2007 12:27 PM, ffm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > According to the download page for ship.2, 653 is the latest signed stable, > > but according to OS images the latest image is 650. Since many issues that > > were in 650 have been fixed in 653, and 653 seems to run w/o issues, why the > > two different sources? > > > > Since 653 is signed and (iirc) fixed WPA issues, should we not tell users to > > update to 653 to fix their issues? > > 653 was a stop-gap release and has been tested only as a clean > install. Upgrading from 650 to 653 has not been tested, and so using > olpc-update to get from 650 to 653 is not (yet?) recommended. > > That is the reason for the discrepancy: we can't yet recommend 653 as > an update. Users who need WPA should do a clean install of 653, which > will remove any content they had created in the Journal. > > At the moment, Update.1 will be the first recommended/tested *update* > (as opposed to clean install), although it is possible we will release > something-like-653 which we could feel comfortable recommending as an > update. > --scott > > -- > ( http://cscott.net/ ) > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > -- ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply hazy, ask again later. ~~ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel