On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:18:10PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: > I would argue otherwise. Since Sugar has no control over the > robustness of the network, having some way of sharing at a basic level > from the Journal is seemingly a high priority.
My feeling is that since Sugar has no control over the robustness of the network, the feature will function poorly, if at all. Consequently, I would rather see bug-fixes which will bring the system closer to its intended operation with high probability. However, this is just a personal preference. I'm (mostly) happy to release whatever you send my way, so long as it fixes more problems than it creates. > Half of the high-priority bugs in the link you provide are in fact not > really Sugar bugs, but subsystem bugs. The others don't seem to be > particularly pressing. Perhaps a few hours of triage are called for? Here are a few of my favorites: http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7011 <--- Zoom buttons should cycle http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7220 <--- Populate activity ring http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/4236 <--- Cancel activity startup http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7020 <--- Force activity shutdown http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6895 <--- Access point UI http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6909 http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/5444 <--- Robustness to failure http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6148 <--- Non-ASCII Activity Names http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6471 <--- Activity startup times http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6472 http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6237 <--- Cloaked APs http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6281 <--- 802.1x for NY,UY! http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/4877 <--- Session API Michael _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel