On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:18:10PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: >> I would argue otherwise. Since Sugar has no control over the >> robustness of the network, having some way of sharing at a basic level >> from the Journal is seemingly a high priority. > > My feeling is that since Sugar has no control over the robustness of the > network, the feature will function poorly, if at all. Consequently, I > would rather see bug-fixes which will bring the system closer to its > intended operation with high probability. However, this is just a > personal preference. I'm (mostly) happy to release whatever you send my > way, so long as it fixes more problems than it creates. > >> Half of the high-priority bugs in the link you provide are in fact not >> really Sugar bugs, but subsystem bugs. The others don't seem to be >> particularly pressing. > > Perhaps a few hours of triage are called for? Here are a few of my > favorites:
After the feature freeze we should definitely spend a good amount of time on bugs triage. The sugar components has not been seriously triaged in the last several months. Marco _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
