On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am 28.09.2008 um 07:59 schrieb C. Scott Ananian: > >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> The lock-down of this page (which causes lock-down of all included pages >>> transitively) was fine until Scott replaced the references to the 8.2 >>> versions of activities with the old G1G1 page. E.g., when the page was >>> locked, it included >>> >>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(8.2) >>> >>> which is okay to be pegged at v. 94. >>> >>> But now it includes and locks down >>> >>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(latest) >>> >>> which makes it impossible for me to update that page to v. 95 to match >>> the >>> latest joyride. >>> >>> Please unlock as long as the page references the original G1G1 page. See >>> edit history at >>> >>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/8.2 >> >> I expect to refork the Activities/G1G1 page soon (probably as soon as >> we declare an 8.2 final). In the interim, it makes my life easier to >> both (a) have 8.2 point to G1G1, so I don't have to edit things in two >> places, and (b) have the 8.2 (and G1G1) page locked, so that I am >> certain I know what activity version changes are being >> proposed/tested. I don't expect this to last for long. >> >> For now, can you either ask me via email or file a trac request >> assigned to me for the etoys update you'd like to make? You can also >> copy/paste the template into Activities/Joyride for now to get >> testing; that shouldn't be locked. Should the etoys update be >> considered if we made another release candidate? (I've noticed >> there's a new etoys RPM in joyride). >> >> I know this is inconvenient, but if you can bear with me, it will make >> my life in the next week easier. You can transfer the inconvenience >> to me by making me update your activity info for you, and if that gets >> to be too much work it will motivate me to reconsider unprotecting the >> page to let you do it yourself. =) > > Hehe. So please s/94/95/g in [Activities/Etoys (latest)]. > > And yes, if #8608 gets approved and etoys-3.0.2159 gets in then please use > Etoys-95, too (this is just if you are doing a new build anyway, do not hold > the release for it).
Out of an abundance of caution: is there any problem with using Etoys-95 if the etoys rpm is *not* updated? I've upgraded Etoys on the [[Activities/G1G1]] page, so our testers are probably testing Etoys-95 + 765, which has etoys-2153-1. Is that okay? --scott -- ( http://cscott.net/ ) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel