Am 28.09.2008 um 11:30 schrieb C. Scott Ananian: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: >> >> Am 28.09.2008 um 07:59 schrieb C. Scott Ananian: >> >>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The lock-down of this page (which causes lock-down of all >>>> included pages >>>> transitively) was fine until Scott replaced the references to the >>>> 8.2 >>>> versions of activities with the old G1G1 page. E.g., when the >>>> page was >>>> locked, it included >>>> >>>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(8.2) >>>> >>>> which is okay to be pegged at v. 94. >>>> >>>> But now it includes and locks down >>>> >>>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(latest) >>>> >>>> which makes it impossible for me to update that page to v. 95 to >>>> match >>>> the >>>> latest joyride. >>>> >>>> Please unlock as long as the page references the original G1G1 >>>> page. See >>>> edit history at >>>> >>>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/8.2 >>> >>> I expect to refork the Activities/G1G1 page soon (probably as soon >>> as >>> we declare an 8.2 final). In the interim, it makes my life easier >>> to >>> both (a) have 8.2 point to G1G1, so I don't have to edit things in >>> two >>> places, and (b) have the 8.2 (and G1G1) page locked, so that I am >>> certain I know what activity version changes are being >>> proposed/tested. I don't expect this to last for long. >>> >>> For now, can you either ask me via email or file a trac request >>> assigned to me for the etoys update you'd like to make? You can >>> also >>> copy/paste the template into Activities/Joyride for now to get >>> testing; that shouldn't be locked. Should the etoys update be >>> considered if we made another release candidate? (I've noticed >>> there's a new etoys RPM in joyride). >>> >>> I know this is inconvenient, but if you can bear with me, it will >>> make >>> my life in the next week easier. You can transfer the inconvenience >>> to me by making me update your activity info for you, and if that >>> gets >>> to be too much work it will motivate me to reconsider unprotecting >>> the >>> page to let you do it yourself. =) >> >> Hehe. So please s/94/95/g in [Activities/Etoys (latest)]. >> >> And yes, if #8608 gets approved and etoys-3.0.2159 gets in then >> please use >> Etoys-95, too (this is just if you are doing a new build anyway, do >> not hold >> the release for it). > > Out of an abundance of caution: is there any problem with using > Etoys-95 if the etoys rpm is *not* updated? I've upgraded Etoys on > the [[Activities/G1G1]] page, so our testers are probably testing > Etoys-95 + 765, which has etoys-2153-1. Is that okay?
Yes, no problem. The only relevant change there is use of bundle_id instead of service_name. - Bert - _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel