By not providing more information, I was sending a subtle signal that I am busy with something else right now and do not want to go into "digging up everything I know or can find out about batteries" mode at the moment.
On 12/10/2010 3:09 PM, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:56:15 -1000 > Mitch Bradley<w...@laptop.org> wrote: > >> There is some battery info in the _BIF (battery info) method in the >> BATT node of the ACPI DSDT. I don't remember if it is correct or >> not. The numbers below match the DSDT numbers. > > Wait, so where did *those* numbers come from? A spec somewhere, the > EC, or did you actually reverse engineer them? > > (Note that ACPI is only available on XO-1.5, so pulling them from ACPI > on XO-1 isn't an option.) > > > >> >> On 12/10/2010 2:38 PM, Andres Salomon wrote: >>> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:15:10 +0000 >>> David Woodhouse<dw...@infradead.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 23:05 +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: >>>>> >>>>> + >>>>> + switch (tech.intval) { >>>>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY_NiMH: >>>>> + switch (mfr) { >>>>> + case 1: /* Gold Peak */ >>>>> + val->intval = 3000000*.8; >>>>> + break; >>>>> + default: >>>>> + return -EIO; >>>>> + } >>>>> + break; >>>>> + >>>>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY_LiFe: >>>>> + switch (mfr) { >>>>> + case 1: /* Gold Peak */ >>>>> + val->intval = 2800000; >>>>> + break; >>>>> + case 2: /* BYD */ >>>>> + val->intval = 3100000; >>>>> + break; >>>>> + default: >>>>> + return -EIO; >>>>> + } >>>>> + break; >>>>> + >>>>> + default: >>>>> + return -EIO; >>>>> + } >>>>> + >>>>> + return ret; >>>>> +} >>>> _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel