On 12/21/2010 10:28 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 16:43 -0800, Andres Salomon wrote: >> Given that OLPC machines out there currently have broken battery >> information with UPower and friends, I think that the patches should be >> applied. >> >> Doing stuff in the EC or device-tree may be done in the future, but >> even after it's written& debugged, it will still take some time for >> people to upgrade their firmware. > > Agreed. In the general case in future though, it would be really useful > if we could avoid having magic numbers like this in the kernel; we want > them to come from as close to the hardware as possible. > > Given that we *have* a sane firmware on OLPC, we should be using it.
Nod. Sascha: Please file a trac ticket on the EC component with the all the information you need the EC to provide and I'll get the support for that in the works. -- Richard A. Smith <rich...@laptop.org> One Laptop per Child _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel