On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Drake <d...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau <jvo...@shaw.ca> wrote: >> I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the >> 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this >> discussion does not impact the UI and more of a packaging issue I'm an >> not creating a Features page. The discussion can take place here on the >> mailing-list. > > This sounds like a good idea. Indeed, its not a sugar feature request, > its more a packaging detail. > > Peter, what do you think about splitting the cpsection extensions (in > /usr/share/sugar) into individual subpackages, to be selected by the > Sugar Desktop group but not as direct dependencies of the Sugar > packages? For F18+
I've had a bit more of a look at this. Any thoughts on what should be split out and what shouldn't. The language/keyboard obviously should be split out. Are there ones we should most definitely have (hence not split out)? Peter _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
