Hi Martin,
Answers inline. Thanks for helping with the review and all the tips!
On 3/1/24 04:00, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 04:43:53PM -0500, mgal...@akamai.com wrote:
From: Michael Galaxy <mgal...@akamai.com>
In our case, we almost always have two NUMA nodes, so in that
example, we have two PMEM regions which are created on the
Linux kernel command line that get mounted into those two
locations for libvirt to use.
There are PMEM devices which you then expose as filesystems to use for
libvirt as a backing for VM's PMEMs. Do I understand that correctly?
If yes, how are these different? Can't they be passed through?
So, these are very different. QEMU currently already supports passing
through
PMEM for guest internal use (The guest puts its own filesystem onto the
passed-through
PMEM device).
In our case, we are using the PMEM area only in the host to place the
QEMU memory backing
for all guests into a single PMEM area.
To support NUMA correctly, QEMU needs to support mutiple host-level PMEM
areas which
have been pre-configured to be NUMA aware. This is strictly for the
purposes of doing live updates,
not as a mechanism for guests to internally take advantage of persistent
memory... that's
a completely different use case (which in and of itself is very
interesting, but not what we are
using it for).
That's how it works. Does that make sense?
(I'll work on those other requests, thank you)
- Michael
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.libvirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.libvirt.org
