FWIW, I see lots of notifier calls being added to the BTLs (and elsewhere throughout the OMPI code base) over time...

On Dec 3, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Tim Mattox wrote:

The BTLs might have added calls to the notifier framework in their error paths. The notifier framework is currently in the ORTE layer... not sure if we could
move it down to OPAL.  Ralph, any thoughts on that?

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Richard Graham <rlgra...@ornl.gov> wrote:
George told me about what he is doing, so no changes would be committed
until George has his changes in.

Are there other changes to the btl's that we should be aware of ?

Rich


On 12/3/08 11:47 AM, "George Bosilca" <bosi...@eecs.utk.edu> wrote:

Terry,

I'm involved [at some degree] in both efforts and I can confirm these
two efforts will not affect each other in any bad way.

  george.

On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:42 , Terry Dontje wrote:

I don't have any *strong* objections. However, I know that Eugene
and George B have been working on some Fastpath code changes that we
should make sure neither project obliterates the other.

--td

Richard Graham wrote:
Now that 1.3 will be released, we would like to go ahead with the
plan to move the btl¹s out of the MPI layer. Greg Koenig who is
doing most of the work has started a wiki page with details on the
plans. Right now details are sketchy, as Greg is digging through
the code, and has only hand written notes on data structures that
need to be moved, include files that are not needed, etc. The page
is at:
_https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/BTLExtraction_

The first three steps basically only involve code motion, moving
items such as ompi_list, and renaming them, moving where the code
is actually located in the repository, and the like. For these we
do not plan to put out a formal RFC, but comments are very welcome,
and any hands that are willing to help with this are even more
welcome.

The last phase where the btl¹s are made dependent on OPAL, and
supporting libraries such as mpools I expect will be disruptive,
and will definitely require an RFC, and will also be a longer
process.

Please send comments,
Rich
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel




--
Tim Mattox, Ph.D. - http://homepage.mac.com/tmattox/
tmat...@gmail.com || timat...@open-mpi.org
   I'm a bright... http://www.the-brights.net/

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems


Reply via email to