Hi Kiril,
Appreciate the quick response.
> Hi Samuel,
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:18:54 -0600 (MDT)
> "Samuel K. Gutierrez" <sam...@lanl.gov> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm writing a simple profiling library which utilizes
>>PERUSE. My callback
>
> So am I :)
>
>> function counts communication events (see example code
>>below). I noticed
>> that in OMPI v1.3 spec->peer is sometimes a negative
>>value (OMPI v1.2.6
>> did not exhibit this behavior). I added some boundary
>>checks, but it
>> seems as if this is a bug? I hope I'm not missing
>>something...
>
> It took me quite some time to reproduce the error - I also
Sorry about that - I should have provided more information.
> got peer value "-1" for the Peruse peruse_comm_spec_t
> struct. I only managed to reproduce this with
> communication of a process with itself, which is an
> unusual scenario. Anyway, for all the tests I did, the
> error happened only when:
>
> -a process communicates with itself
> -the MPI receive call is made
> -the Peruse event "PERUSE_COMM_MSG_REMOVE_FROM_UNEX_Q" is
> triggered
That's interesting... Nice work!
>
>
> The file ompi/mca/pml/ob1/pml_ob1_recvreq.c seems to be
> the place where the above event is called with a wrong
> value of the peer attribute.
>
> I will let you know if I find something.
I will also take a look.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Kiril
>
>>
>> The peruse test provided in the OMPI v1.3 source
>>exhibits similar behavior:
>> mpirun -np 2 ./mpi_peruse | grep peer:-1
>>
>> int callback(peruse_event_h event_h, MPI_Aint unique_id,
>> peruse_comm_spec_t *spec, void *param) {
>> if (spec->peer == rank) {
>> return MPI_SUCCESS;
>> }
>> rrCounts[spec->peer]++;
>> return MPI_SUCCESS;
>> }
>>
>>
>> Any insight is greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Samuel K. Gutierrez
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>
>
Appreciate the help,
Samuel K. Gutierrez
