Jeff Squyres wrote: > On May 27, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Holger Mickler wrote: > >> would you mind sharing this patch? We'd like to test our current VT >> version with >> some MPI RMA code :) >> > > No problem-o. I've submitted this patch upstream to Intel as well. > Note that the patch slightly changed between 3.1 and 3.2; this is the > 3.2 patch: > > --- imb/src/IMB_window.c 2008-10-21 01:17:31.000000000 -0700 > +++ IMB_3.2/src/IMB_window.c 2009-05-26 05:29:15.000000000 -0700 > @@ -140,6 +140,9 @@ > c_info->rank, 0, 1, c_info->r_data_type, > c_info->WIN); > MPI_ERRHAND(ierr); > } > + /* JMS Added a call to MPI_WIN_FENCE, per MPI-2.1 11.2.1 */ > + ierr = MPI_Win_fence(0, c_info->WIN); > + MPI_ERRHAND(ierr); > ierr = MPI_Win_free(&c_info->WIN); > MPI_ERRHAND(ierr); > } >
Great, works fine! >> Does anyone know of some (small) code/benchmark that uses all >> available MPI RMA >> functionality? As far as I see, IMB only uses fence and >> put/get/accumulate. No >> locks or post/wait/start/complete... >> > > We have a few one-sided tests in the ompi-test repository (which I think > Dresden has access to?), but I'm not 100% sure that they're correct... > Yes, we do have access. We'll try the tests and see how far we can get :) Thanks a lot! Holger
