On Jun 11, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote: > The idea was one large memory segment for all processes and it wasn't > unlinked after complete attach so that we could have spawned procs also use > shmem (which never worked, of course). So I think we could unlink during > init at this point..
I could have sworn that we decided that long ago and added the unlink. Probably we *did* reach that conclusion long ago, but never actually got around to adding the unlink. Sam and I are still in that code area now; we might as well add the unlink while we're there. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
