Jeff Squyres a écrit :
Great!
I see in your other mail that you pulled something from MPICH2 to make this
work.
Does that mean that there's a even-newer version of ROMIO that we should pull in its entirety? It's a little risky to pull most stuff from one released version of ROMIO and then more stuff from another released version. Meaning: it's little nicer/safer to say that we have ROMIO from a single released version of MPICH2.
If possible. :-)
Is it possible?
Don't get me wrong -- I want the new ROMIO, and I'm sorry you've had to go
through so many hoops to get it ready. :-( But we should do it the best way
we can; we have history/precedent for taking ROMIO from a single
source/released version of MPICH[2], and I'd like to maintain that precedent if
at all possible.
I've just made a comparison with the very last MPICH2 version
(mpich2-1.3.1) and found very little differencies.
I've reported them into bitbucket. I 've tested with the ROMIO tests
and I 've commited them.
So, we now have on bitbucket the version from mpich2-1.3.1 plus the
patch for the attribute issue.
Pascal
