I'm with you on that. Let's create a fake module using the ISO C99 naming scheme, and leave it to MTT to figure out where is breaks!
george. On Jan 19, 2011, at 14:23 , Nathan Hjelm wrote: > I don't know if this has been discussed before or if this will break Windows > (or some obscure platform) support but I would like to start using the ISO > C99 style for struct initialization (see section 6.7.8, example 10 in > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1124.pdf). Using this style > would make mca code much easier to read. Any thoughts? Would this break > something? > > Example: > struct module_foo { > char *bar; > int baz; > }; > > struct foo foobar = { > .bar = "foobar", > .baz = 1 > }; > > -Nathan > HPC-3, LANL > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
