Okay, you should have it in r24929. Use:

orte-ps --parseable

to get the new output.


On Jul 23, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:

> Gar - have to eat my words a bit. The jobid requested by orte-ps is just the 
> "local" jobid - i.e., it is expecting you to provide a number from 0-N, as I 
> described below (copied here):
> 
>> A jobid of 1 indicates the primary application, 2 and above would specify 
>> comm_spawned jobs. 
> 
> Not providing the jobid at all corresponds to wildcard and returns the status 
> of all jobs under that mpirun.
> 
> To specify which mpirun you want info on, you use the --pid option. It is 
> this option that isn't working properly - orte-ps returns info from all 
> mpiruns and doesn't check to provide only data from the given pid.
> 
> I'll fix that part, and implement the parsable output.
> 
> 
> On Jul 22, 2011, at 8:55 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jul 22, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Ralph,
>>> 
>>> I'd like three things :-)
>>> 
>>> a) A --report-jobid option that prints the jobid on the first line in a 
>>> form that can be passed to the -jobid option on ompi-ps. Probably tagging 
>>> it in the output if -tag-output is enabled (e.g. jobid:<jobid>) would be a 
>>> good idea.
>>> 
>>> b) The orte-ps command output to use the same jobid format.
>> 
>> I started looking at the above, and found that orte-ps is just plain wrong 
>> in the way it handles jobid. The jobid consists of two fields: a 16-bit 
>> number indicating the mpirun, and a 16-bit number indicating the job within 
>> that mpirun. Unfortunately, orte-ps sends a data request to every mpirun out 
>> there instead of only to the one corresponding to that jobid.
>> 
>> What we probably should do is have you indicate the mpirun of interest via 
>> the -pid option, and then let jobid tell us which job you want within that 
>> mpirun. A jobid of 1 indicates the primary application, 2 and above would 
>> specify comm_spawned jobs. A jobid of -1 would return the status of all jobs 
>> under that mpirun.
>> 
>> If multiple mpiruns are being reported, then the "jobid" in the report 
>> should again be the "local" jobid within that mpirun.
>> 
>> After all, you don't really care what the orte-internal 16-bit identifier is 
>> for that mpirun.
>> 
>>> 
>>> c) A more easily parsable output format from ompi-ps. It doesn't need to be 
>>> a full blown XML format, just something like the following would suffice:
>>> 
>>> jobid:719585280:state:Running:slots:1:num procs:4
>>> process_name:./x:rank:0:pid:3082:node:node1.com:state:Running
>>> process_name:./x:rank:1:pid:4567:node:node5.com:state:Running
>>> process_name:./x:rank:2:pid:2343:node:node4.com:state:Running
>>> process_name:./x:rank:3:pid:3422:node:node7.com:state:Running
>>> jobid:345346663:state:running:slots:1:num procs:2
>>> process_name:./x:rank:0:pid:5563:node:node2.com:state:Running
>>> process_name:./x:rank:1:pid:6677:node:node3.com:state:Running
>> 
>> Shouldn't be too hard to do - bunch of if-then-else statements required, 
>> though.
>> 
>>> 
>>> I'd be happy to help with any or all of these.
>> 
>> Appreciate the offer - let me see how hard this proves to be...
>> 
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Greg
>>> 
>>> On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hmmm...well, it looks like we could have made this nicer than we did :-/
>>>> 
>>>> If you add --report-uri to the mpirun command line, you'll get back the 
>>>> uri for that mpirun. This has the form of <jobid>:<uri>. As the -h option 
>>>> indicates:
>>>> 
>>>> -report-uri | --report-uri <arg0>  
>>>>                      Printout URI on stdout [-], stderr [+], or a file
>>>>                      [anything else]
>>>> 
>>>> The "jobid" required by the orte-ps command is the one reported there. We 
>>>> could easily add a --report-jobid option if that makes things easier.
>>>> 
>>>> As to the difference in how orte-ps shows the jobid...well, that's 
>>>> probably historical. orte-ps uses an orte utility function to print the 
>>>> jobid, and that utility always shows the jobid in component form. Again, 
>>>> could add or just use the integer version.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 22, 2011, at 7:01 AM, Greg Watson wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does anyone know if it's possible to get the orte jobid from the mpirun 
>>>>> command? If not, how are you supposed to get it to use with orte-ps? 
>>>>> Also, orte-ps reports the jobid in [x,y] notation, but the jobid argument 
>>>>> seems to be an integer. How does that work?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Greg
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> 
> 


Reply via email to