Ralph,

Looking good so far. I did notice that ompi-ps always seems to have an exit 
code of 243. Is that on purpose?

Greg

On Jul 25, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:

> r24944 - let me know how it works!
> 
> 
> On Jul 25, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
> 
>> That would probably be more intuitive.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Greg
>> 
>> On Jul 25, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> 
>>> job 0 is mpirun and its daemons - I can have it ignore that job as I doubt 
>>> users care :-)
>>> 
>>> On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Ralph,
>>>> 
>>>> The output format looks good, but I'm not sure it's quite correct. If I 
>>>> run the mpirun command, I see the following:
>>>> 
>>>> mpirun:47520:num nodes:1:num jobs:2
>>>> jobid:0:state:RUNNING:slots:0:num procs:0
>>>> jobid:1:state:RUNNING:slots:1:num procs:4
>>>> process:x:rank:0:pid:47522:node:greg.local:state:SYNC REGISTERED
>>>> process:x:rank:1:pid:47523:node:greg.local:state:SYNC REGISTERED
>>>> process:x:rank:2:pid:47524:node:greg.local:state:SYNC REGISTERED
>>>> process:x:rank:3:pid:47525:node:greg.local:state:SYNC REGISTERED
>>>> 
>>>> Seems to indicate there are two jobs, but one of them has 0 procs. Is that 
>>>> expected? Not a huge problem, since I can just ignore the job with 0 procs.
>>>> 
>>>> Greg
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 23, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Okay, you should have it in r24929. Use:
>>>>> 
>>>>> orte-ps --parseable
>>>>> 
>>>>> to get the new output.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 23, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Gar - have to eat my words a bit. The jobid requested by orte-ps is just 
>>>>>> the "local" jobid - i.e., it is expecting you to provide a number from 
>>>>>> 0-N, as I described below (copied here):
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A jobid of 1 indicates the primary application, 2 and above would 
>>>>>>> specify comm_spawned jobs. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Not providing the jobid at all corresponds to wildcard and returns the 
>>>>>> status of all jobs under that mpirun.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> To specify which mpirun you want info on, you use the --pid option. It 
>>>>>> is this option that isn't working properly - orte-ps returns info from 
>>>>>> all mpiruns and doesn't check to provide only data from the given pid.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'll fix that part, and implement the parsable output.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2011, at 8:55 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi Ralph,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'd like three things :-)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> a) A --report-jobid option that prints the jobid on the first line in 
>>>>>>>> a form that can be passed to the -jobid option on ompi-ps. Probably 
>>>>>>>> tagging it in the output if -tag-output is enabled (e.g. 
>>>>>>>> jobid:<jobid>) would be a good idea.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> b) The orte-ps command output to use the same jobid format.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I started looking at the above, and found that orte-ps is just plain 
>>>>>>> wrong in the way it handles jobid. The jobid consists of two fields: a 
>>>>>>> 16-bit number indicating the mpirun, and a 16-bit number indicating the 
>>>>>>> job within that mpirun. Unfortunately, orte-ps sends a data request to 
>>>>>>> every mpirun out there instead of only to the one corresponding to that 
>>>>>>> jobid.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What we probably should do is have you indicate the mpirun of interest 
>>>>>>> via the -pid option, and then let jobid tell us which job you want 
>>>>>>> within that mpirun. A jobid of 1 indicates the primary application, 2 
>>>>>>> and above would specify comm_spawned jobs. A jobid of -1 would return 
>>>>>>> the status of all jobs under that mpirun.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If multiple mpiruns are being reported, then the "jobid" in the report 
>>>>>>> should again be the "local" jobid within that mpirun.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> After all, you don't really care what the orte-internal 16-bit 
>>>>>>> identifier is for that mpirun.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> c) A more easily parsable output format from ompi-ps. It doesn't need 
>>>>>>>> to be a full blown XML format, just something like the following would 
>>>>>>>> suffice:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> jobid:719585280:state:Running:slots:1:num procs:4
>>>>>>>> process_name:./x:rank:0:pid:3082:node:node1.com:state:Running
>>>>>>>> process_name:./x:rank:1:pid:4567:node:node5.com:state:Running
>>>>>>>> process_name:./x:rank:2:pid:2343:node:node4.com:state:Running
>>>>>>>> process_name:./x:rank:3:pid:3422:node:node7.com:state:Running
>>>>>>>> jobid:345346663:state:running:slots:1:num procs:2
>>>>>>>> process_name:./x:rank:0:pid:5563:node:node2.com:state:Running
>>>>>>>> process_name:./x:rank:1:pid:6677:node:node3.com:state:Running
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Shouldn't be too hard to do - bunch of if-then-else statements 
>>>>>>> required, though.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to help with any or all of these.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Appreciate the offer - let me see how hard this proves to be...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Greg
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hmmm...well, it looks like we could have made this nicer than we did 
>>>>>>>>> :-/
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> If you add --report-uri to the mpirun command line, you'll get back 
>>>>>>>>> the uri for that mpirun. This has the form of <jobid>:<uri>. As the 
>>>>>>>>> -h option indicates:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -report-uri | --report-uri <arg0>  
>>>>>>>>>                 Printout URI on stdout [-], stderr [+], or a file
>>>>>>>>>                 [anything else]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The "jobid" required by the orte-ps command is the one reported 
>>>>>>>>> there. We could easily add a --report-jobid option if that makes 
>>>>>>>>> things easier.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> As to the difference in how orte-ps shows the jobid...well, that's 
>>>>>>>>> probably historical. orte-ps uses an orte utility function to print 
>>>>>>>>> the jobid, and that utility always shows the jobid in component form. 
>>>>>>>>> Again, could add or just use the integer version.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2011, at 7:01 AM, Greg Watson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone know if it's possible to get the orte jobid from the 
>>>>>>>>>> mpirun command? If not, how are you supposed to get it to use with 
>>>>>>>>>> orte-ps? Also, orte-ps reports the jobid in [x,y] notation, but the 
>>>>>>>>>> jobid argument seems to be an integer. How does that work?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Greg
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


Reply via email to