I took a closer look at this, and I think we're getting ourselves confused by the rather large differences between what is on the trunk vs the 1.5 branch. The trunk is doing the "am I bound" calculation correctly - it gets the cpubind bitmask and compares it to the allowed/available cpus.
The 1.5 branch has a problem. Jeff and I discussed it a little more, and agreed that I will create a minimal patch to address the issue of direct-launched procs. We definitely don't want to back-port the logic from the trunk. Will try to have something next week. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:16 AM, nadia.der...@bull.net wrote: > > > Could you please move it to v1.5 (do I need to fill a CMR)? > > Just to clarify - you're asking for the patch to set WHOLE_SYSTEM when we > load the hwloc topology, right? > > If so, please file a CMR. Note that there's some differences between how > hwloc is used between the trunk and the v1.5 branch; the same commit may > not apply exactly from the trunk to v1.5. > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >
