On Mar 9, 2012, at 1:32 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > An mpool that is aware of local processes lru's will solve the problem in > most cases (all that I have seen)
I agree -- don't let words in my emails make you think otherwise. I think this will fix "most" problems, but undoubtedly, some will still occur. What's your timeline for having this ready -- should it go to 1.5.5, or 1.6? More specifically: if it's immanent, and can go to v1.5, then the openib message is irrelevant and should not be used (and backed out of the trunk). If it's going to take a little bit, I'm ok leaving the message in v1.5.5 for now. > but yes, we need to rework the pml to handle the remaining cases. There are > two things that need to be changed (from what I can tell): > > 1) allow rget to fallback to send/put depending on the failure (I have > fallback on put implemented in my branch-- and in my btl). > 2) need to devise new criteria on when we should progress the rdma_pending > list to avoid deadlock. > > #1 is fairly simple and I haven't given much though to #2. > > -Nathan > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
