On Mar 9, 2012, at 14:23 , Nathan Hjelm wrote: > BTW, can anyone tell me why each mpool defines mca_mpool_base_resources_t > instead of defining mca_mpool_blah_resources_t. The current design makes it > impossible to support more than one mpool in a btl. I can delete a bunch of > code if I can make a btl fall back on the rdma mpool if leave_pinned is not > set.
I guess you can name them as you like as long as you do the right cast to avoid compiler complaints. Why can't you support multiple mpools in the same BTL? george.
