Interesting - I can certainly fix the test so it lets make check complete. FWIW: I didn't know we were running on BG/Q - does it work? I assume this is with slurm?
On Sep 11, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote: > In testing 1.6.2rc2 on a BG/Q front-end I've encountered the following > failure from "make check": > > Failure : Mismatch: input "/soft", expected:0 got:1 > SUPPORT: OMPI Test failed: opal_path_nfs() (1 of 20 failed) > FAIL: opal_path_nfs > > What I find digging deeper is that the mount of /soft is a bit unusual (at > least to me): > > $ grep /soft /etc/fstab > /gpfs/vesta_scratch/software /soft none _netdev,bind 0 0 > $ mount | grep /soft > /gpfs/vesta_scratch/software on /soft type none (rw,bind,_netdev) > $ grep /soft /proc/mounts > /dev/vesta_scratch /soft gpfs rw,relatime 0 0 > > > Looking into the mount man page I find that the "_netdev" is NOT a problem, > just an keyword used to identify mounts that require network access to > implement " -O no_netdev" in mount. > The "problem" that opal_path_nfs is encountering is that this is a "bind" > mount which makes an already mounted fs (or subtree of one) available at a > second location. > > If I am understanding "expected:0 got:1" correctly this failure shows that > the TEST is getting this case (bind-mount of GPFS fs) incorrect. > So, this is a BENIGN failure, but distracting (and preventing "make check" > from completing). > > -Paul > > -- > Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov > Future Technologies Group > Computer and Data Sciences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
