On Sep 12, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > Sounds like that should resolve my failure - I'll try to verify from a > nightly tarball when I have the opportunity.
Thanks! I'll probably make another RC this afternoon, because we're really closing in on it. > The fix I had in mind would have been to parse the mounts with sufficient > intelligence to match a bind-mount to the original mount and determine it's > type. > I suppose that is still possible if one gets ambitious. I am not that ambitious. :-) -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
